Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 3 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH/RFC/GSoC 3/3] t0301: test credential-cache support of XDG_RUNTIME_DIR

From: 惠轶群 <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:08:45

2016-03-17 0:17 GMT+08:00 Junio C Hamano [off-list ref]:
Hui Yiqun [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
t0301 now tests git-credential-cache support for XDG user-specific
runtime file $XDG_RUNTIME_DIR/git/credential.sock. Specifically:

* if $XDG_RUNTIME_DIR exists, use socket at
  `$XDG_RUNTIME_DIR/git/credential-cache.sock`.

* otherwise, `/tmp/git-$uid/credential-cache.sock` is taken.
Is it better to have the fallback in /tmp, and not in
~/.git-credential-cache/, and why?

Is it because the wish is to always use /tmp/git-$uid/ as a fallback
for $XDG_RUNTIME_DIR (as opposed to ~/.git-credential-cache/, which
is specific to the credential-cache and would look strange if we
used it for other "runtime" things)?
Yes, I mean to use it as a general fallback for git.

xdg base dir spec does not specify where to fallback when
$XDG_RUNTIME_DIR is not defined. It just says:

If $XDG_RUNTIME_DIR is not set applications should fall back to
a replacement directory with similar capabilities and print a warning
message. Applications should use this directory for communication
and synchronization purposes and should not place larger files in it,
since it might reside in runtime memory and cannot necessarily be
swapped out to disk.

tmpfs is just like what it describes. And many other applications
put socket under which, such as tmux.

On the other hand, I think, falling back to $HOME/.git-credential-cache/socket
doesn't make any sense for back-compability cannot be ensured.
Just being curious, and wanting to see the reasoning behind the
design decision the patch series makes in the log message of one of
these patches.

Thanks.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help