Re: [PATCH] Also read SQUASH_MSG if a conflict on a merge squash occurred
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden> Date: 2016-06-15 23:08:39
Sven Strickroth [off-list ref] writes:
Here hook_arg1 would be always "merge" and never "squash"... Before my
change it was only "squash" if no conflict occurred.
Oh, that wasn't an intended change. It was merely an illustration
of a possible restructuring of the flow to avoid having to have
identical read functions in two separate places.