Thread (13 messages) flat view 13 messages, 4 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH v3] fetch-pack: fix object_id of exact sha1

From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:08:37

On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 08:35:54PM -0300, Gabriel Souza Franco wrote:
quoted
The code looks good to me. Do we need documentation or test updates?

Here's a test that can be squashed in. For documentation, it looks like
we don't cover the "<sha1> <ref>" form at all. That's maybe OK, as it's
mostly for internal use by remote-http (though fetch-pack _is_ plumbing,
so perhaps some other remote-* could make use of it). But perhaps we
should document that "<sha1>" should work.
Thanks for providing a test, I hadn't looked up those yet. For
documentation, should
it be on the same patch or a new one? Also, I'm not exactly sure how
to word that <refs>...
can also contain a hash instead of a ref.
I think it make sense as part of the same patch. I guess you could still
call the argument "<refs>" even though it takes more now, and just
explain the new feature in the appropriate section. I can't think of a
better word to use (somehow "<objects>" feels too broad, and the primary
use would still be a list of refs).

-Peff
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help