Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH] unpack-trees: do not delete i-t-a entries in worktree even when forced

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:08:25

Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy  [off-list ref] writes:
Intent-to-add entries are basically "I may want to commit these files
later, but for now they are untracked". As such, when the user does "git
reset --hard <tree>", which removes i-t-a entries from the index, i-t-a
entries in worktree should be kept as untracked.
Hmm, I can see that the control flow of "reset --hard" for an i-t-a
path does pass through this function, but it is not very obvious
to see how this will not negatively affect other uses of the
unpack-trees machinery (e.g. "checkout" and "merge", especially when
such a path needs to turn into a directory by getting removed).
quoted hunk
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <redacted>
---
 Lost two files today, luckily I had a backup.

 t/t2203-add-intent.sh | 15 +++++++++++++++
 unpack-trees.c        |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/t/t2203-add-intent.sh b/t/t2203-add-intent.sh
index 2a4a749..63086bf 100755
--- a/t/t2203-add-intent.sh
+++ b/t/t2203-add-intent.sh
@@ -82,5 +82,20 @@ test_expect_success 'cache-tree invalidates i-t-a paths' '
 	test_cmp expect actual
 '
 
+test_expect_success 'reset --hard leaves on-disk ita entries alone' '
+	git init keep-ita &&
+	(
+	cd keep-ita &&
+	echo abc >abc &&
+	echo def >def &&
+	git add abc &&
+	git commit -m abc &&
+	git add -N def &&
+	git reset --hard HEAD &&
+	echo def >expected &&
+	test_cmp expected def
+	)
+'
+
 test_done
 
diff --git a/unpack-trees.c b/unpack-trees.c
index 9f55cc2..1a2271b 100644
--- a/unpack-trees.c
+++ b/unpack-trees.c
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static int do_add_entry(struct unpack_trees_options *o, struct cache_entry *ce,
 {
 	clear |= CE_HASHED;
 
-	if (set & CE_REMOVE)
+	if ((set & CE_REMOVE) && !ce_intent_to_add(ce))
 		set |= CE_WT_REMOVE;
 
 	ce->ce_flags = (ce->ce_flags & ~clear) | set;
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help