Re: [PATCH 06/21] convert manual allocations to argv_array
From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:08:19
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 03:07:00AM -0500, Eric Sunshine wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/line-log.c b/line-log.c@@ -746,23 +747,16 @@ void line_log_init(struct rev_info *rev, const char *prefix, struct string_list if (!rev->diffopt.detect_rename) { - int i, count = 0; - struct line_log_data *r = range; - const char **paths; - while (r) { - count++; - r = r->next; - } - paths = xmalloc((count+1)*sizeof(char *)); - r = range; - for (i = 0; i < count; i++) { - paths[i] = xstrdup(r->path); - r = r->next; - } - paths[count] = NULL; + struct line_log_data *r; + struct argv_array paths = ARGV_ARRAY_INIT; + + for (r = range; r; r = r->next) + argv_array_push(&paths, r->path); parse_pathspec(&rev->diffopt.pathspec, 0, - PATHSPEC_PREFER_FULL, "", paths); - free(paths); + PATHSPEC_PREFER_FULL, "", paths.argv); + /* argv strings are now owned by pathspec */ + paths.argc = 0; + argv_array_clear(&paths);This overly intimate knowledge of the internal implementation of argv_array_clear() is rather ugly.
Yep, I agree. Suggestions? We can just leak the array of "char *". This function is called only once per program invocation, and that's unlikely to change. I guess we can make an argv_array_detach_strings() function. Or maybe even just argv_array_detach() would be less gross, and then this function could manually free the array but not the strings themselves. -Peff