Re: [PATCH v5 02/12] ref-filter: use strbuf_split_str_omit_term()
From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:08:16
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 04:28:10PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:quoted
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 04:12:08PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:quoted
quoted
To be honest, though, I am now on the fence, considering the possible whitespace issue.Certainly not having to see s[0]->buf over and over is a huge win ;-). Is the "whitespace issue" a big deal? Does it involve more than a similar sibling to string_list_split() that trims the whitespace around the delimiter (or allows a regexp as a delimiter "\s*,\s*")?I think that solution would work (and IMHO would actually be preferable to the split-then-trim that strbuf_split does). But it does mean writing new code.True, but only when we decide to support trimming the whitespace, which can come later. I do not even know if it is wise to accept %(align:position=left, width=4) when %(align:position=left,width=4) would do the job just fine.
Yeah, it was mostly just about being friendly to the user. But if nobody is complaining, it may not even be worth worrying about. -Peff