Re: [PATCH] merge-recursive: option to disable renames
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:08:16
"Felipe Gonçalves Assis" [off-list ref] writes:
+no-renames;; + Turn off rename detection. + See also linkgit:git-diff[1] `--no-renames`.
Even though by default for merge-recursive the rename detection is
on, if we are adding an option to control this aspect of the
behaviour from the command line, it should follow the usual pattern,
i.e.
(1) the code to parse options would allow an earlier "--no-renames"
on the command line to be overridden with a later "--renames"; and
(2) the description in the documentation would be headed by
"--[no-]renames", describes which one is the default, etc.
quoted hunk
diff --git a/merge-recursive.c b/merge-recursive.c index 8eabde2..ca67805 100644 --- a/merge-recursive.c +++ b/merge-recursive.c@@ -1839,9 +1839,16 @@ int merge_trees(struct merge_options *o, entries = get_unmerged(); record_df_conflict_files(o, entries); - re_head = get_renames(o, head, common, head, merge, entries); - re_merge = get_renames(o, merge, common, head, merge, entries); - clean = process_renames(o, re_head, re_merge); + if (o->detect_rename) { + re_head = get_renames(o, head, common, head, merge, entries); + re_merge = get_renames(o, merge, common, head, merge, entries); + clean = process_renames(o, re_head, re_merge); + } + else { + re_head = xcalloc(1, sizeof(struct string_list)); + re_merge = xcalloc(1, sizeof(struct string_list)); + clean = 1; + }
Yup, this is much nicer than butchering diffcore-rename.c for no good reason ;-). Even if you _know_ that process_renames() currently does not do anything other than returning 1, it is a bad idea to hardcode that knowledge on the caller's side. Perhaps
entries = get_unmerged();
record_df_conflict_files(o, entries);
- re_head = get_renames(o, head, common, head, merge, entries);
- re_merge = get_renames(o, merge, common, head, merge, entries);
+ if (o->detect_rename) {
+ re_head = get_renames(o, head, common, head, merge, entries);
+ re_merge = get_renames(o, merge, common, head, merge, entries);
+ } else {
+ re_head = xcalloc(1, sizeof(struct string_list));
+ re_merge = xcalloc(1, sizeof(struct string_list));
+ }
clean = process_renames(o, re_head, re_merge);Preparing a new empty string_list instance with xcalloc() without doing string_list_init() is probably "caller knows too much about implementation detail of the API", but get_renames() seems to do so already, so I'll let it pass.