Re: [PATCHv9 1/6] submodule-config: keep update strategy around
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:08:10
Stefan Beller [off-list ref] writes:
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
quoted
+ } else if (!strcmp(item.buf, "update")) { + if (!value) + ret = config_error_nonbool(var); + else if (!me->overwrite && + submodule->update != SM_UPDATE_UNSPECIFIED)Funny indentation here (locally fixable).I looked through the code base and reread our CodingGuidelines to find out what is considered correct. (I assumed we had a gnu-ish coding style w.r.t. breaking overly long lines in conditions, which is having the next line be indented with 4 spaces.) So I assume by funny you mean "the next line doesn't start below the opening parenthesis"?
I think we typically do one of the two:
if (A &&
B && C && ...)
or
if (A &&
B && C && ...)
That is, the second line may align just inside the open paren on the
first line, or even deeper, but never shallower.