Hi Junio,
On Wed, 27 Jan 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
On Tue, 26 Jan 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
- git checkout -b @/at-test &&
+ if ! test_have_prereq MINGW
+ then
+ git checkout -b @/at-slash
I presume that this is meant to be "@/at-test", not "@/at-slash".
Oh my. That's what you get for redoing patches from scratch. Sorry about
that!
Heh. That is why it makes me feel uneasy, after asking you to fetch
from me and fix it up, to hear that you will send in a new reroll.
I should have mentioned that I did rebase what your pu carries onto my
changes locally and found that the only differences were the consistency
tweaks (such as not adding the empty line pointed out by Eric, and such as
using !MINGW through-out).
Ciao,
Dscho