Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] t0060: verify that basename() and dirname() work as expected

On 13/01/16 09:27, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

Hi Torsten,

On Wed, 13 Jan 2016, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:

quoted

On 01/12/2016 08:57 AM, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

quoted

+static struct test_data basename_data[] = {
+	/* --- POSIX type paths --- */
+	{ NULL,              "."    },
+	{ "",                "."    },
+	{ ".",               "."    },
+	{ "..",              ".."   },
+	{ "/",               "/"    },
+#if defined(__CYGWIN__) && !defined(NO_LIBGEN_H)

Why the !defined(NO_LIBGEN_H)

Shouldn't CYGWIN always behave the same ?

One would assume... Alas, it does not.

Err, ... yes it does! :-P

I inherited the code in question and wondered the same. I opted for
keeping the code as a documentation of the differing behavior.

Exactly.

ATB,
Ramsay Jones