On 10.11.2015 13:56, Richard Ipsum wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+Existing tools such as Github's pull-requests and Gerrit are already
+in wide use, why bother with something new?
+
+We are concerned that whilst git is a distributed version control
+system the systems used to store comments and reviews for content
+under version control are usually centralised,
I think it's a bit unjust to unconditionally mention Gerrit in this context as you seem to imply that Gerrit does not store *any* review data in Git.
Even without Dave's upcoming notedb, Gerrit already stores refs/changes in Git, and with the reviewnotes plugin [1] also the outcome of a review in refs/notes/review.
[1] https://gerrit.googlesource.com/plugins/reviewnotes/+/refs/heads/master/src/main/resources/Documentation/refs-notes-review.md
--
Sebastian Schuberth