Stephen & Linda Smith [off-list ref] writes:
[Re-worded my explanation.]
"revisions, file contents and logs was in the second sentence of the first patch.
"files and history" was in the first sentence of the first patch.
When I was getting rid of the duplication I decided that "revisions, file contents
and logs" was a little more explicit and so decided to keep that wording.
As a secondary reason that is the wording in gitweb.txt.
Makes sense; thanks.