Re: [PATCH 4/6] Squelch warning about an integer overflow

Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:

Hi Junio,

On Mon, 26 Oct 2015, Junio C Hamano wrote:

quoted

Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

We cannot rely on long integers to have more than 32 bits...

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <redacted>
---

Interesting.  8192 * 1024 * 1024 does not fit within 32-bit long, of
course.  Perhaps we can lose L after 1024 if we are explicitly
saying that the result ought to be size_t (which may be larger than
long)?

Sure. But it would make the patch harder to read.

Do you insist?

Not at all.  I think the series is already in 'next', and if I
haven't merged it yet, I should.