Re: [PATCH 2/6] remote-http(s): Support SOCKS proxies

Hi,

On Mon, 26 Oct 2015, Junio C Hamano wrote:

James McCoy [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

quoted

The code looks OK but the last paragraph makes _us_ worried.  What
is the licensing status of the original at SO?

According to Stackoverflow[0],

  As noted in the Stack Exchange Terms of Service[1] and in the footer of
  every page, all user contributions are licensed under Creative Commons
  Attribution-Share Alike[2]. Proper attribution[3] is required if you
  republish any Stack Exchange content.

[0]: https://stackoverflow.com/help/licensing

Yes, and (please correct me if I am wrong--this is one of the times
I hope I am wrong!) I thought BY-SA does not mesh well with GPLv2,
in which case we cannot use this patch (instead somebody has to
reimplement the same without copying).

Pat, could you please allow us to insert your SOB?

Thanks,
Dscho