Eric Sunshine [off-list ref] writes:
With this in mind, my
question was also indirectly asking whether there was sufficient
justification of the long-term cost of a --count-lines option. The
argument that --count-lines would help test a proposed
strbuf_count_lines() likely does not outweigh that cost.
I agree. If we expect users to call --count-lines outside
rebase-interactive.sh and our own tests, then the actual use should be
justified in the commit message.
If not, then at least the --count-lines option should be hidden and not
documented in the public doc. But I agree that introducing test-strbuf
would be even better.
--
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/