Re: [PATCH] Add fetch.recurseSubmoduleParallelism config option

Stefan Beller [off-list ref] writes:

Assuming we go with your second school of thought (N are the real
running processes, M including the finished but still pending output tasks),

That's neither of my two, I would think.

Anyway, I think it is now clear that it not very easy to say "I know
what to fill in M and N" there ;-).