The char buf[40] is safe (at least while the strings are not
translated), but I'd rather avoid magic numbers like this 40 in the
code, and use a construct that does not have this size limitation.
Especially if it makes the code shorter.
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <redacted>
---
ref-filter.c | 20 ++++++++------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ref-filter.c b/ref-filter.c
index 6044eb0..7932c21 100644
--- a/ref-filter.c
+++ b/ref-filter.c
@@ -1116,7 +1116,6 @@ static void populate_value(struct ref_array_item *ref)
strcmp(formatp, "trackshort") &&
(starts_with(name, "upstream") ||
starts_with(name, "push"))) {
- char buf[40];
unsigned int nobracket = 0;
if (!strcmp(valp, ",nobracket"))@@ -1135,24 +1134,21 @@ static void populate_value(struct ref_array_item *ref)
v->s = "";
else if (!num_ours) {
if (nobracket)
- sprintf(buf, "behind %d", num_theirs);
+ v->s = xstrfmt("behind %d", num_theirs);
else
- sprintf(buf, "[behind %d]", num_theirs);
- v->s = xstrdup(buf);
+ v->s = xstrfmt("[behind %d]", num_theirs);
} else if (!num_theirs) {
if (nobracket)
- sprintf(buf, "ahead %d", num_ours);
+ v->s = xstrfmt("ahead %d", num_ours);
else
- sprintf(buf, "[ahead %d]", num_ours);
- v->s = xstrdup(buf);
+ v->s = xstrfmt("[ahead %d]", num_ours);
} else {
if (nobracket)
- sprintf(buf, "ahead %d, behind %d",
- num_ours, num_theirs);
+ v->s = xstrfmt("ahead %d, behind %d",
+ num_ours, num_theirs);
else
- sprintf(buf, "[ahead %d, behind %d]",
- num_ours, num_theirs);
- v->s = xstrdup(buf);
+ v->s = xstrfmt("[ahead %d, behind %d]",
+ num_ours, num_theirs);
}
continue;
} else if (!strcmp(formatp, "trackshort") &&--
2.6.0.rc2.24.gb06d8e9.dirty