Re: [PATCH 29/67] use strip_suffix and xstrfmt to replace suffix
From: Eric Sunshine <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:06:35
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 06:50:38AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:38:12AM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:quoted
quoted
@@ -1524,9 +1525,9 @@ int finish_http_pack_request(struct http_pack_request *preq) lst = &((*lst)->next); *lst = (*lst)->next; - tmp_idx = xstrdup(preq->tmpfile); - strcpy(tmp_idx + strlen(tmp_idx) - strlen(".pack.temp"), - ".idx.temp"); + if (!strip_suffix(preq->tmpfile, ".pack.temp", &len)) + die("BUG: pack tmpfile does not end in .pack.temp?"); + tmp_idx = xstrfmt("%.*s.idx.temp", (int)len, preq->tmpfile);These instances of repeated replacement code may argue in favor of a general purpose replace_suffix() function: char *replace_suffix(const char *s, const char *old, const char *new) { size_t n; if (!strip_suffix(s, old, &n)) die("BUG: '%s' does not end with '%s', s, old); return xstrfmt("%.*s%s", (int)n, s, new); } or something.Yeah, that is tempting, but I think the "die" here is not at all appropriate in a reusable function. I'd probably write it as: char *replace_suffix(const char *s, const char *old, const char *new) { size_t n; if (!strip_suffix(s, old, &n)) return NULL; return xstrfmt("%.*s%s", (int)n, s, new); } and do: tmp_idx = replace_suffix(preq->tmpfile, ".pack.temp", ".idx.temp"); if (!tmp_idx) die("BUG: pack tmpfile does not end in .pack.temp?"); but then we are not really saving much. And it is not clear whether that is even a sane output for replace_suffix. I can easily imagine three behaviors when we do not end in the original suffix: - return NULL to signal error - return the original with no replacement - return the original with "new" appended So I'm not sure it makes a good reusable function beyond these three call-sites.
Indeed. I had a "gently" version in mind to satisfy callers not interested in dying, but it's so little code that it likely isn't worth it.