Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
I am flexible with the terminology, but the point is that I think
the quoting rules are better be specified _outside_ the description
of a particular atom, but as a general rule.
I agree, but for now we have only one %($open) ... %(end) pair, so it
makes sense to me to leave the series as-is and to move some of the
explanations in a general section in the next series (that will
introduce %(if) or another opening atom).
--
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/