Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH] pack-protocol: document newline behavior in push commands

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:06:27

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:
Right, it was the second "we know..." that made me worry. It is really
"we assume". :) Whether it is right according to the spec or not, the
real world is sometimes more complicated. And given that there is no
real advantage to changing the sending behavior now, I didn't think it
worth doing.
Agreed.
quoted
quoted
This documentation update is good in that it makes the examples
easier to read (by the way, the first pre-context line ends with
'\n', which we would eventually also address) by making the reader
understand that the convention used in this S:/C: exchange
illustration the optional LF is not shown.
In the second patch I left them all intact, but I agree that we could
drop the "\n" entirely from the example conversations, as it is implied
(and GIT_PACKET_TRACE, for example, does not even show it).
Sure.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help