On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 3:28 AM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <redacted>
Because? Title just tells what the patch meant to do (i.e. instead
of returning it keeps looping), but does not say why it is a good
idea. Besides, this a no-op patch and does not make it keep looping.
Because the next patch adds some post processing before returning the
value. Having all the paths come to the same point would simplify the
code. Will update the commit message.
--
Duy