Signed-off-by: Alex Henrie <redacted>
---
builtin/show-ref.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/builtin/show-ref.c b/builtin/show-ref.c
index dfbc314..131ef28 100644
--- a/builtin/show-ref.c
+++ b/builtin/show-ref.c
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
static const char * const show_ref_usage[] = {
N_("git show-ref [-q | --quiet] [--verify] [--head] [-d | --dereference] [-s | --hash[=<n>]] [--abbrev[=<n>]] [--tags] [--heads] [--] [<pattern>...]"),
- N_("git show-ref --exclude-existing[=pattern] < ref-list"),
+ N_("git show-ref --exclude-existing[=<pattern>] < <ref-list>"),
NULL
};
--
2.5.0
From: "Alex Henrie" <redacted>
quoted hunk
Signed-off-by: Alex Henrie <redacted>
---
builtin/show-ref.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/builtin/show-ref.c b/builtin/show-ref.c
index dfbc314..131ef28 100644
--- a/builtin/show-ref.c
+++ b/builtin/show-ref.c
static const char * const show_ref_usage[] = {
N_("git show-ref [-q | --quiet] [--verify] [--head] [-d
| --dereference] [-s | --hash[=<n>]] [--abbrev[=<n>]] [--tags]
[--heads] [--] [<pattern>...]"),
- N_("git show-ref --exclude-existing[=pattern] < ref-list"),
+ N_("git show-ref --exclude-existing[=<pattern>] < <ref-list>"),
Should the '<' stdin redirection be shown?
It looks (at first glance) as if this gained a double '< <' at the
beginning of 'ref-list', rather than being a clean indication of the
redirection. Perhaps change 'ref-list' to 'ref-list-file' for a slight
improvement in clarity - this it's only occurance, and the redirection
would best match a file.
NULL
};
--
2.5.0
--
Philip
(will be offline for 4 days)
2015-08-29 4:21 GMT-06:00 Philip Oakley [off-list ref]:
Should the '<' stdin redirection be shown?
It looks (at first glance) as if this gained a double '< <' at the beginning
of 'ref-list', rather than being a clean indication of the redirection.
Perhaps change 'ref-list' to 'ref-list-file' for a slight improvement in
clarity - this it's only occurance, and the redirection would best match a
file.
This syntax occurs in three other places in Git:
git cat-file (--batch | --batch-check) [--follow-symlinks] < <list-of-objects>
git check-attr --stdin [-z] [-a | --all | <attr>...] < <list-of-paths>
git hash-object --stdin-paths < <list-of-paths>
So if we need to say <ref-list-file> for clarity, we should also say
<object-list-file> and <path-list-file> for these other commands.
I think the most sane thing to do is to commit this patch as-is, and
then someone can submit a separate patch to reword all four usage
strings for increased clarity.
-Alex