Re: [PATCH v2] utf8.c: print warning about iconv errors
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:06:13
Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 03:35:58PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:quoted
Max Kirillov [off-list ref] writes:quoted
* do not limit number of warnings - does not worth complicating the codeUnless the warning leads to a quick "die()", wouldn't this make Git unusable by spewing a "falling back to verbatim copy" for each and every line of the message of a commit that has 'encoding' element in its header in the "git log" output, no?We only do the reencode once per commit. So it would be once per commit rather than once per line. Which still sounds kind of annoying, if you are using "git log --oneline" or similar. I think I'd favor a single warning in general, along the lines of "some encodings could not be converted". But of course if you are trying to figure out _which_ encodings your system doesn't have, that's not very helpful. Maybe we could have an advice.encodingFailure config flag with a tristate: - false: don't spew any warnings - true: give a generic warning once per program - all: give a specific warning for each case, like "unable to convert EUC-JP to UTF-8: iconv_open: Invalid argument". (Sadly EINVAL is what iconv_open seems to return when you it doesn't know about a particular encoding; it may be nicer to translate to something more reasonable than what strerror() provides).
Sounds sensible.
quoted
quoted
+char *reencode_string_len(const char *in, int insz, + const char *out_encoding, const char *in_encoding, + int *outsz) +{ + if (!same_encoding(in_encoding, out_encoding)) + warning("Iconv support is disabled at compile time. It is likely that\nincorrect data will be printed or stored in repository.\nConsider using other build for this task."); + return NULL; +}Hmmm, I suspect this may be seen as regression by those who build Git without ICONV for performance, knowing that there is nothing in their data that requires character set conversion.I don't think it matters that much.
Yeah, I think I agree. Thanks.