Re: git name-rev not accepting abbreviated SHA with --stdin

Sitaram Chamarty [off-list ref] writes:

On 06/25/2015 05:41 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:

quoted

Sitaram Chamarty [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

This *is* documented, but I'm curious why this distinction is made.

I think it is from mere laziness, and also in a smaller degree
coming from an expectation that --stdin would be fed by another
script like rev-list where feeding full 40-hex is less work than
feeding unique abbreviated prefix.

Makes sense; thanks.  Maybe if I feel really adventurous I will,
one day, look at the code :-)

Sorry, but I suspect this is not 100% laziness; it is meant to read
text that has object names sprinkled in and output text with object
names substituted.  I suspect that this was done to prevent a short
string that may look like an object name like deadbabe from getting
converted into an unrelated commit object name.