Thread (2 messages) flat view 2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH 3/3] introduce "format" date-mode

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:05:36

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 09:22:18AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
quoted
	strbuf_addf(&f, "%s ", fmt);
Basically I was trying to avoid making any assumptions about exactly how
strftime works. But presumably "stick a space in the format" is a
universally reasonable thing to do. It's a hack, but it's contained to
the function.
Why can't I shake this feeling that (" %s", fmt), i.e. prepend not
append, is the safer thing to do than to append?
Because then removing the extra space involves `memmove` of the buffer,
rather than just shortening the length by one.
That does not explain why I feel the other way is safer, though ;-)

In any case, responding myself to my other question, strftime(3)
does not define any useful error information even for a case where
you feed nonsense format to it, so it is even not possible to
protect ourselves by checking errno or doing something similar X-<.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help