Re: [PATCH v4 04/19] for-each-ref: add '--points-at' option

Karthik Nayak [off-list ref] writes:

On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 6:15 AM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

 3 & 4 as a single patch may make more sense, if we were to tolerate the
"let's copy & paste first and then later remove the duplicate" as a way to
postpone touching "tag.c" side in order to first concentrate on for-each-ref.

I have not formed a firm opinion on what the right split of the series is, but
so far (assuming that the temporary duplication is the best we can do) what
I am seeing in this series makes sense to me.

Thanks.

That would mean squashing 3&4, 6&7 and 10&11 also on similar lines.

I have a slight preference for keeping the pairs not squashed. This way,
we have a clear separation "write reusable library code" / "use it". But
I'm fine with squashing if others prefer.

-- 
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/