On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:45 AM, Stefan Beller [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 3:21 AM, Paul Tan [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
@@ -138,13 +202,33 @@ static void am_next(struct am_state *state)
*/
static void am_run(struct am_state *state)
{
- while (state->cur <= state->last)
+ while (state->cur <= state->last) {
+
+ /* TODO: Patch application not implemented yet */
+
am_next(state);
+ }
When reviewing the previous patch I did look at this loop for awhile confused,
if you want to apply patches in am_next(state) and thought there might be
a better approach.
Maybe you want to move this chunk with the TODO into the previous patch,
so it's clear after reading the documentation of am_run, that the actual am is
missing there.
Ah right, this is a mistake. This comment should be in the previous patch.
Thanks,
Paul