Mike Hommey [off-list ref] writes:
I do agree that this is all confusing, but allow me to point out that
it's already plenty confusing: "namespace" is a term that has been used to
designate a generic kind of namespace *and* refs/namespaces. See for
example:
https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/Documentation/git-describe.txt#L39
https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/Documentation/git-fetch.txt#L113
https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/Documentation/git-filter-branch.txt#L36
(note how this one is specifically about refs/replace/)
there are many more.
"One more breakage does not hurt" is not something we want to see.
_REF kind of implies _one_ specific ref....
I thought about suggesting GIT_REPLACE_REFS for that exact reason,
but decided against it, because (1) if you are using replace, then
you know you are not using a single ref but a group of refs in a
single hierarchy already, and (2) if you do not know what replace
and notes are, GIT_REPLACE_REFS and GIT_NOTES_REF look just being
inconsistent (even though the intention of the difference is to be
more logical). s/S/_BASE/ would make that better, though.
As for exposing a pref, I'm not entirely sure it makes sense to.
I don't see an immediate need for it, and it is easy to add later,
so let's limit the scope of the initial adoption of the feature.
Thanks.