Paul Tan [off-list ref] writes:
so it's more or less a direct translation of the shell script, and we
can be sure it will have the same behavior. I'm definitely in favor of
switching this to use remote_find_tracking(), the question is whether
we want to do it in this patch or in a future patch on top.
Ah, OK.
I then agree that the topic should be a straight-forward literal
translation of the current scripted Porcelain. Switching
implementation detail to share more code can and should come on top
with more careful consideration, as that step can change the
semantics by mistake.
Thanks.