On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Louis Stuber
[off-list ref] wrote:
Signed-off-by: Louis Stuber <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Antoine Delaite <redacted>
---
It looks like this patch applies on top of the bisect old/new series
posted by Antoine.
This should be stated somewhere.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
git-bisect.sh | 8 +++++++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/git-bisect.sh b/git-bisect.sh
index 109bd65..d3d19cb 100644
--- a/git-bisect.sh
+++ b/git-bisect.sh
@@ -183,6 +183,10 @@ bisect_start() {
then
echo "$BISECT_BAD" >"$GIT_DIR/BISECT_TERMS" &&
echo "$BISECT_GOOD" >>"$GIT_DIR/BISECT_TERMS"
+ if test "$BISECT_BAD" = "new"
+ then
+ echo "" > "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_OLDNEWMODE"
+ fi
I am not sure it's worth it to have both BISECT_TERMS and BISECT_OLDNEWMODE.
Also please note that I suggested to Antoine that the BISECT_BAD and
BISECT_GOOD variables be renamed to something else, like I already did
in some C files.