Re: Proposal for git stash : add --staged option
From: <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:05:07
Hi again, just wanted to tell that I have created a solution by doing a few lines of scripting: git-cstash
#/bin/sh
git commit -m 'temporary, will be stashed soon'
git stash --include-untracked
git reset HEAD^1
git stash
git stash pop stash@{1}
Le 2015-04-22 11:25, Johannes Schindelin a écrit :
Hi Edgar, On 2015-04-22 10:30, edgar.hipp@netapsys.fr wrote:quoted
When you have a lot of unstaged files, and would like to test what happens if you undo some of the changes that you think are unecessary, you would rather keep a copy of those changes somewhere. For example Changed but not updated: M config_test.xml M config_real.xml I have changed both config_test.xml and config_real.xml, but I think the changes made in config_test.xml are unnecessary. However, I would still like to keep them somewhere in case it breaks something. In this case for example, I would like to be able to stash only the file config_test.xml Eg: git add config_test.xml git stash --staged So that after this, my git looks like this: Changed but not updated: M config_real.xml and my stash contains only the changes introduced in config_test.xml `git stash --keep-index` doesn't give the necessary control, because it will still stash everything (and create unnecessary merge complications if I change the files and apply the stash)I often have the same problem. How about doing this:git add config_real.xml git stash -k git resetThe difference between our approaches is that I keep thinking of the staging area as the place to put changes I want to *keep*, not that I want to forget for a moment. Having said that, I am sympathetic to your cause, although I would rather have `git stash [--patch] -- [<file>...]` that would be used like `git add -p` except that the selected changes are *not* staged, but stashed instead. Ciao, Johannes