Remi Galan Alfonso [off-list ref] writes:
Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Is this sufficient?
quoted
If you are going to do something in 2/2 that relies on the format of
this line being correct (as opposed to "noop" or "#" that can have
any garbage on the remainder of the line), wouldn't you want to at
least check $sha1 is sensible?
That's also something that I was wondering, I wrote about it in the
0/2 part of this patch, I wanted some opinion about it.
Ideally, I think we should do a sanity check before starting the rebase,
and error out if we encounter an invalid command, a command that should
be followed by a valid sha1 and does not, ...
But currently, we do the verification while applying commands, and I
don't think there's anything really helpful to do if we encounter a
"drop this-is-not-a-sha1" command.
So, IMHO, why not do this check, but I'm not sure it will actually help
much.
--
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/