Re: [PATCH v2] pull: handle --log=<n>
From: Dennis Kaarsemaker <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:04:50
On di, 2015-05-19 at 19:19 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Hopefully now you have some idea how your approach is problematic.
Yes, thanks for the thorough explanation!
Two more bad sideeffects, so two more reasons not to take this approach:
- test_must_fail tests might now fail for the wrong reason, undetectedly
("ref does not exist" instead of "can't handle ref")
- same for TODO tests
--
Dennis Kaarsemaker
www.kaarsemaker.net