On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 04:24:00PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Trevor Saunders [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
When the first bad commit has been found git bisect prints something
like this:
<40 char sha1> is the first bad commit
Commit <40 char sha1>
...
:100644 100644 10f5e57... a46cfeb... M bisect.c
:100755 100755 ae3fec2... 65a19fa... M git-bisect.sh
The raw diff output is not really useful, and its kind of silly to print
the sha1 twice. Instead lets print something like this:
The first bad commit is
Commit <sha1>
...
According to +CCouder, this change will break existing people's use
cases.
See $gmane/268881
Well, technically he just said it might be that people are parsing the
output and could be broken, but if you'd rather not take that risk then
I guess we just have to leave things the way they are.
Trev