Thread (5 messages) flat view 5 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] cat-file: add --follow-symlinks to --batch

From: David Turner <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:04:43

On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 09:06 +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote:
quoted
+	ln -s loop2 loop1 &&
+	git add . &&
+	git commit -am "test"
+'
These tests will fail on a file system that does not support symbolic 
links, such as on Windows. Would you please separate the test cases 
(that come after the setup) into two groups:

1. Those that inspect the filesystem and expect a symbolic link. Protect 
these tests with a SYMLINKS prerequisite.
I believe that none of these require that.
Note that you do not require a symlink enabled file system to generate a 
repository with symlinks, i.e., you don't have to protect the setup code 
with SYMLINKS. For this, you can use 'test_ln_s_add' instead of the 
above sequence of 'ln -s' followed by a single 'git add .'.
Will fix, thanks.
quoted
+
+echo $hello_sha1 blob $hello_size > found
This seems to be used only in the next test. Please move it inside 
test_expect_success.
This is used in a number of tests, e.g this one:
quoted
+test_expect_success 'git cat-file --batch-check --follow-symlinks works for in-repo, same-dir links' '
+	echo HEAD:same-dir-link | git cat-file --batch-check --follow-symlinks > actual &&
+	test_cmp found actual
+'
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help