Re: [PATCH/RFC] blame: CRLF in the working tree and LF in the repo

Am 28.04.2015 um 21:52 schrieb Junio C Hamano:

Johannes Sixt [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

I set none of these. But I do commit CRLF and expect to get CRLF
back. Am I commiting binary files? Am I doing something that "Git does
not support"? Am I "on [my] own"?

I think these specific sentences are merely uninformed opinions; if
I ignore and re-read what people said in the discussion, I think the
thread as a whole makes sense.

Thanks for the clarification. Following the thread only superficially, I 
feared some behavior change (or even just a redefinition of what "is 
supported") is about to surface that impacts established workflows.

-- Hannes