Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] p7300: add performance tests for clean

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Jeff King [off-list ref] wrote:

Do we actually need a large repo here? The real cost is coming from the
directories we create. We could actually start with a totally empty
repository if we wanted (though I don't think the t/perf system handles
that right now). But if there's not a reason to use the large repo, I
think using test_perf_default_repo is better, as it works out of the box
without specifying extra environment variables (well, it works either
way, but you get a nasty warning from perf-lib.sh).

-Peff

Sure, I'll change this to the default. I wasn't sure about the
performance characteristics of clean (does working tree size matter?)
when I started so it felt safest to go with a large repo.