Re: [BUG] "git pull" will regress between 'master' and 'pu'
From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:04:29
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 11:59:04AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:quoted
@@ -334,7 +333,7 @@ true) eval="git-merge $diffstat $no_commit $verify_signatures $edit $squash $no_ff $ff_only" eval="$eval $log_arg $strategy_args $merge_args $verbosity $progress" eval="$eval $gpg_sign_args" - eval="$eval -m \"\$merge_name\" $merge_head" + eval="$eval FETCH_HEAD" ;; esac eval "exec $eval"as we seem to special-case the name FETCH_HEAD. It assumes that git-merge's parsing of FETCH_HEAD is the same as what we do in git-pull, but that seems safe.Unfortunately, "git merge"'s parsing of FETCH_HEAD forgets that we may be creating an Octopus. Otherwise the above should work well.
That sounds like a bug we should fix regardless.
quoted
Unfortunately we still have to compute $merge_head ourselves here for the "git pull --rebase" case.That is not that unfortunate, I would say.
I guess not. It is only a few lines of sed. And having the details there does let us customize the error cases. My main worry would just be a maintenance one: that somebody modifies git-pull to calculate merge_head differently, but it turns out that we ignore it when calling git-merge. But that's probably not that likely to matter in practice. -Peff