Re: [PATCH 0/3] Another approach to large transactions

On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:

This is now pushed out and sitting at the tip of 'pu'.  It seems to
break one of the tests in 1400 when merged to 'next', but I didn't
look it closely.

Thanks.

ok, I'll look more closely.