Max Kirillov [off-list ref] writes:
Again, just surface nitpicks.
[side: Kirill Smelkov [off-list ref] removed from CC, as the
ddress just bounced for me]
+static int changed_parents(struct combine_diff_path *p, int n)
+{
+ int parent_idx;
+ int result = 0;
+
+ for (parent_idx = 0; parent_idx < n; ++parent_idx) {
+ if (p->parent[parent_idx].status != ' ')
+ ++result;
We write C (not C++) and favor post_increment++ over ++pre_increment
when there is no valid reason to do otherwise (e.g. the result of
increment getting used in a larger expression).
Thanks.