Re: [PATCH 0/25] detecting &&-chain breakage

On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 6:04 AM, Jeff King [off-list ref] wrote:

[...]
There were a number of false positives, though as a percentage of the
test suite, probably not many (it's just that we have quite a lot of
tests).  Most of them were in rather old tests, and IMHO the fixes I did
actually improved the readability of the result. So overall I think this
is a very positive change; I doubt it will get in people's way very
often, and I look forward to having one less thing to worry about
handling manually in review. The biggest downside is that I may have
automated Eric Sunshine out of a job. :)

Heh. I won't mind. Thanks for doing a thorough job.

Ironically, one of the broken here-doc &&-links you detected with
--chain-lint and fixed in 4/25 was from a patch from me: 5a9830cb
(t8001/t8002 (blame): add blame -L :funcname tests, 2013-07-17).