Re: [PATCHv2 1/2] t7508: test git status -v
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:03:58
Michael J Gruber [off-list ref] writes:
quoted hunk
Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <redacted> --- t/t7508-status.sh | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)diff --git a/t/t7508-status.sh b/t/t7508-status.sh index 8ed5788..4989e98 100755 --- a/t/t7508-status.sh +++ b/t/t7508-status.sh@@ -133,6 +133,12 @@ test_expect_success 'status with status.displayCommentPrefix=false' ' test_i18ncmp expect output ' +test_expect_success 'status -v' ' + git diff --cached >>expect &&
This makes the test rely on the previous one succeeding. Do we care, or is reproducing what ought to be in 'expect' at this step too expensive?
+ git status -v >output && + test_cmp expect output +' + test_expect_success 'setup fake editor' ' cat >.git/editor <<-\EOF && #! /bin/sh