Re: Strange reachability inconsistency (apparently, at least...)
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:03:53
Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 7:03 AM, [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
I have a (fsck-clean) git tree in which for 2 commits A and B: * "git merge-base --is-ancestor A B" returns 0 * "git log B..A" returns a non-empty set of commits I get this behaviour with 2.3.0 as well as with 2.1.3 and 1.7.12. Is that a real bug or am I just misinterpreting something ?Sounds strange. Is it possible to share the repository (or an anonymised copy of it)?
Actually it does not sound all that strange.
I suspect that B is indeed a proper descendant of A, but you have
commits with screwed-up committer timestamps between these two
commits that break the cut-off heuristic used by log and reb-list.
Grab the output from "git rev-list B..A". These are supposed to be
ahead of B (i.e. should not be reachable from B). Then look at the
output from "git log B" (no lower bound) and see if these commits
appear there, perhaps like:
$ git rev-list B..A | sed -e 's/^/^/' >phantoms
$ git log --format='%H %ct' B | grep -C2 -f phantoms
Hits from the latter "grep" would indicate that what the traversal
B..A claimed that are not reachable from B contained some commits
that are indeed reachable from B.