Thread (5 messages) flat view 5 messages, 3 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [RFC] git cat-file "literally" option

From: karthik nayak <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:03:51

On 02/18/2015 07:28 PM, Duy Nguyen wrote:> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 7:50
 > Use what sha1_object_info() uses behind the scene. Loose object
 > encodes object type as a string, you could just print that string and
 > skip the enum object_type conversion. You probably need special
 > treatment for packed objects too. See parse_sha1_header() and
 > unpack_object_header().

Thank you will look into that!

On 02/18/2015 09:17 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 5:58 AM, Duy Nguyen [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
... skip the enum object_type conversion. You probably need special
treatment for packed objects too.
I do not think you can store object of type "bogus" in a pack data stream
to begin with, so I wouldn't worry about packed objects.

"cat-file --literally" that does not take "-t" would not be useful, as the
output "cat-file <type> <object>" does not tell what <type> the thing
is. Other things like sizes and existence can be inferred once you have
an interface to do "cat-file <type> <object>", so in that sense -e and -s
are not essential (this also applies to "cat-file" without --literally).

By definition, "--literally -p" would not be able to do anything fancier than
just dump the bytes (i.e. what "cat-file <type> <object>" does), as the
bogus type is not something the code would know the best external
representation for.
Thanks for clearing that out. Will work on this for now.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help