Thread (16 messages) flat view 16 messages, 5 authors, 2016-06-15

RE: read() MAX_IO_SIZE bytes, more than SSIZE_MAX?

From: Randall S. Becker <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:03:45

On Feb 7 2015 at 9:14 PM Junio C Hamano wrote:
On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Joachim Schmitz [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Junio C Hamano <gitster <at> pobox.com> writes:
quoted
Yup, I agree that is a sensible way to go.

 (1) if Makefile overrides the size, use it; otherwise
 (2) if SSIZE_MAX is defined, and it is smaller than our internal 
default, use it; otherwise
 (3) use our internal default.

And leave our internal default to 8MB.

That way, nobody needs to do anything differently from his current 
build
set-up,
quoted
and I suspect that it would make step (1) optional.
something like this:

/* allow overwriting from e.g. Makefile */ #if !defined(MAX_IO_SIZE) # 
define MAX_IO_SIZE (8*1024*1024) #endif
/* for plattforms that have SSIZE and have it smaller */ #if 
defined(SSIZE_MAX && (SSIZE_MAX < MAX_IO_SIZE) # undef MAX_IO_SIZE /* 
avoid warning */ # define MAX_IO_SIZE SSIZE_MAX #endif
No, not like that. If you do (1), that is only so that the Makefile can override a broken definition a platform may give to SSIZE_MAX.  So
(1) if Makefile gives one, use it without second-guessing with SSIZE_MAX.
(2) if SSIZE_MAX is defined, and if it is smaller than our internal default, use it.
(3) all other cases, us our internal default.
That is reasonable. I am more concerned about our git-upload-pak (separate thread) anyway :)

Cheers, Randall
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help