Re: [PATCH] t1050-large: replace dd by test-genrandom
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:03:29
Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 03:40:10PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
- test-genrandom seed2 2500000 >huge && + printf "\0%2500000s" Y >huge &&[...] Are we depending on the binary-ness of these test files by the way? The leading NUL \0 looked a bit strange to me.I don't think so. We do not want to do a text diff, because that would overflow our GIT_ALLOC_LIMIT. But the core.bigfilethreshold check is what will make them binary, not the actual content. So a gigantic text file is arguably a better test of the feature in question.
Perhaps. The original used "dd seek" primarily so that we can logically have large file without wasting diskspace, in addition to make sure that the result would compress well. The large printf will still waste the diskspace, but disks are cheap enough to tolerate a hanful of files of a few megabytes and you already made sure that the compressibility is what matters more to the test latency, so I think all is good. Thanks.