Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH 1/2] support for --no-relative and diff.relative

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:03:25

Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
Patch 2/2 also seems to share similar line-wrapping breakages that
make it unappliable, but more importantly, the configuration that is
supposed to correspond to --relative option only parses a boolean.
Is that the right design, or should it also be able to substitute a
command line `--relative=<path>` with an argument?

The last was a half-way rhetorical question and my answer is that
boolean-only is the best you could do...
...
[Footnote]

*1* Actually, you could declare that "diff.relative=true/" means the
    'true/' directory while "diff.relative=true" means the boolean
    'true' aka 'diff --relative', but I think it is too confusing.
    Let's not make it worse by going that route.
Addendum.

It was only a "half-way rhetorical question", because I am willing
to be persuaded that diff.relative=true/ vs diff.relative=true is
*not* too subtle/confusing to be a good idea, if enough people whose
judgement I trust agrees.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help