Stefan Beller wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- a/builtin/receive-pack.c
+++ b/builtin/receive-pack.c
[...]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -1077,27 +1100,15 @@ static void execute_commands(struct command *commands,
[...]
+ if (shallow_update)
+ assure_connectivity_checked(commands, si);
Looking at this code alone, it seems like assure_connectivity_checked()
is going to ensure that connectivity was checked, so that I can assume
connectivity going forward. But the opposite is true --- it is a
safety check that prints a warning and doesn't affect what I can
assume.
The factored-out function fails in what it is meant to do, which is to
save the reader of execute_commands from having to look at the
implementation of the parts they are not interested in.
Would something like warn_if_skipped_connectivity_check() make sense?
Jonathan