Re: [PATCH] is_hfs_dotgit: loosen over-eager match of \u{..47}

Torsten Bögershausen [off-list ref] writes:

Don't we have the same possible problem under NTFS?
Under Linux + VFAT ?
Under all OS + VFAT ?

I do not think so, as NTFS codepath does not use the (previouly too
wide but now fixed) is_hfs_dotgit() in the first place, and
is_ntfs_dotgit() does not read one unicode codepoint at a time if I
remember correctly.

And what happens if I export NTFS to Mac OS X?
(Other combinations possible)
Shouldn't fsck under all OS warn for NTFS and hfs possible attacks ?

Doesn't it?  Have you read the whole series you are commenting on?