Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH] for_each_reflog_ent_reverse: turn leftover check into assertion

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:03:12

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:
I _think_ the patch below is also applicable to the code before my
boundary-fixing patch. But the rearranging also made me more confident
in it.
Yeah, thanks for a fix.
quoted hunk
-- >8 --
Subject: for_each_reflog_ent_reverse: turn leftover check into assertion

Our loop should always process all lines, even if we hit the
beginning of the file. We have a conditional after the loop
ends to double-check that there is nothing left and to
process it. But this should never happen, and is a sign of a
logic bug in the loop. Let's turn it into a BUG assertion.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <redacted>
---
Of course I cannot say something like "this can never happen; the old
code was wrong to handle this case" without a nagging feeling that I am
missing something, so extra careful eyes are appreciated (and are why I
would rather have an assert here than removing the code and silently
dropping lines if I am wrong).

 refs.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/refs.c b/refs.c
index ccb8834..1f77fa6 100644
--- a/refs.c
+++ b/refs.c
@@ -3451,7 +3451,7 @@ int for_each_reflog_ent_reverse(const char *refname, each_reflog_ent_fn fn, void
 
 	}
 	if (!ret && sb.len)
-		ret = show_one_reflog_ent(&sb, fn, cb_data);
+		die("BUG: reverse reflog parser had leftover data");
 
 	fclose(logfp);
 	strbuf_release(&sb);
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help